http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/27 Berisi tulisan kegiatan hibah penelitian dosen Universitas Riau Kepulauan internal maupun eksternal Tue, 07 Apr 2026 04:47:36 GMT 2026-04-07T04:47:36Z http://localhost:8080/xmlui/bitstream/id/43a20e8a-dabd-4bb4-896a-be32b51f26f2/ http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/27 http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/411 REFORMASI DI BIDANG BIROKRASI UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN GOOD GOVERNANCE DALAM HUKUM KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK ABRA, EH The state is the highest organization in the life of the people in a region. As an organization, the state has goals that are contained in the state constitution. In order to realize the goals of the state, it is necessary to form a government structure. In the present context, the state does not only act as a night watchman, which is only to maintain order and carry out the law, but more than that, the state has a duty to prosper its people. Bureaucratic reform has been widely recognized in Indonesia both at the conceptual and practical levels. The term bureaucratic reform is known as state administration reform, which is a terminology that covers the political, economic, legal, social, cultural to defense and security domains; legislative, executive, and judicial. Negara merupakan organisasi tertinggi dalam kehidupan masyarakat dalam suatu wilayah. Sebagai sebuah organisasi, negara, memiliki tujuan yang dimuat dalam konstitusi negara. Guna merealisasikan apa yang menjadi tujuan negara maka perlu dibentuk sebuah susunan pemerintahan. Dalam konteks kekinian negara tidak hanya sekedar bertindak sebagai penjaga malam yakni hanya sekedar menjaga ketertiban dan melaksanakan hukumtetapi lebih dari itu negara memiliki tugas untuk mensejahterakan rakyatnya. Mahfud MD, menyebutkan bahwa untuk mencapai cita-cita atau tujuan nasional tersebut perlu disepakati dasar-dasar organisasi dan penyelenggaraan negara1 Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:00:00 GMT http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/411 2021-12-01T00:00:00Z http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/410 IUS CONTITUENDUM PENEGAKAN HUKUM POLITIK UANG PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH DI INDONESIA ABRA, EH Money politics in general elections and regional head elections continues to be an interesting problem to be discussed but has the power of resolution which can be said to be weak. As we know that law will run well when three main factors work well, namely the substance of the law, legal structure and legal culture. If viewed based on the substance of the law, money politics regulation in the election law has accommodated the legal needs. However, there are important things that should be noted together, which are related to the elements of TSM that must be fulfilled so that it can be said as money politics with disqualification sanctions. In addition, the legal culture as an element of the legal system is of particular concern in the enforcement of money politics in this paper. No matter how good the regulations and how many law enforcement agencies elect the regional head, if not accompanied by a good legal culture, then the law enforcement will only be in vain. Berdasarkan teori ketatanegaraan Indonesia, pesta demokrasi berlangsung dengan dua sistem pemilihan. Pemilihan umum untuk memilih Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dan Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah. Dan pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Kedua pesta demokrasi tersebut selalu menyisakkan berbagai persoalan hukum. Salah satunya adalah terkait politik uang. Objek tulisan pada penelitian kali ini adalah terkait politik uang dalam pemilihan kepala daerah. Sebagaimana regulasi yang telah ada, dapat dikatakan bahwa undang-undang pilkada yang berlaku ini adalah yang lebih baik dalam mengatur pelanggaran politik uang jika dibandingkan dengan regulasi sebelumnya. Sekalipun demikian undang-undang terkait pilkada jelas belum dapat dikatakan sempurna. Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 GMT http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/410 2020-06-30T00:00:00Z http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/409 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN THE AMENDMENT TO THE 1945 CONSTITUTION FORM OF OBLIGATIONS AND DUTIES OF MPR MEMBERS ABRA, EH The 1945 Constitution has been amended four times, the changes that have occurred are considered more nuanced in terms of political needs. The 1945 Constitution as the highest law that should be able to become the voice of the people is dominated by the tug of war interests of political parties. Article changes are only articles related to the authority of the head of government and Indonesian institutions. Therefore, the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is substantially and procedurally not able to touch the needs and participation of the community. If you look at Law Number 17 of 2014 concerning the People's Consultative Assembly, the People's Representative Council, the Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional People's Representative Council, the actual need for community participation is part of the tasks of the MPR, but until now the task of the mandate of the law is completely has not been able to be implemented. Sebagaimana difahami bahwa konstitusi merupakan hukum dasar yang dijadikan landasan dalam penyelenggaraan negara. Sebagai hukum dasar, konstitusi dapat berbentuk tertulis dan tidak tertulis. Konstitusi yang tertulis di Indonesia disebut dengan UndangUndang Dasar. Konstutisi mempunyai peran untuk mempertahankan esensi keberadaan sebuah negara dari pengaruh berbagai perkembangan yang bergerak dinamis. Oleh karena itu, konstitusi yang ideal merupakan hasil dari penyesuaian dan penyempurnaan untuk mengikuti segala perkembangan, khususnya yang berkaitan dengan keinginan hati nurani rakyat. Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 GMT http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/409 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/408 DISCONTINUATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES IN INDONESIA ABRA, EH The dissolution of political parties in Indonesia has its own problems. This problem can be seen from the conditions required in the Law on the Constitutional Court and the Law on Political Parties relating to matters that can dissolve political parties. These requirements are considered not to have a good foundation in dissolving political parties, even appearing that they cannot touch on substantive matters so that political parties can be dissolved. Apart from that, there is a much more important problem that is not touched by the law, but in fact damages the value of the goals of political parties and the state in general, namely corruption. Therefore, this paper will discuss the substantive weaknesses of the requirements proposed by the two laws above. So that in addition to adding a new repertoire of legal science in Indonesia, especially in the field of constitutional law. This paper is also expected to provide new ideas on the requirements for the dissolution of political parties in Indonesia. The method used in this paper is normative juridical, with the data source used is secondary data sources consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and legal materials. tertiary. This research was also conducted using several approaches, such as; statutory approach, conceptual approach, historical approach. Salah satu problematika ketatanegaraan yang belum terselesaikan secara baik adalah terkait pembubaran partai di Indonesia. Problematika ini mucul ketika pembubaran partai politik di Indonesia tidak memiliki parameter yang jelas dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Selain itu aturan yang telah ada terkait hal-hal yang dapat menyebabkan bubarnya partai politik mengalami disharmonisasi antara UndangUndang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Undang-Undang Partai Politik. Mon, 01 Jun 2020 00:00:00 GMT http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/408 2020-06-01T00:00:00Z